Even with a mayor, Bristol may not get a coherenttransport policy
即便市長出馬,布里斯托爾也不見得能出臺一個合理的交通政策
Try and put a ticket on this
貼張罰單試試
CLIFTON, in Bristol, is an unlikely hotbed of political activism. Behind high streets filled withindependent cafés, posh delis and expensive flower shops sit grand Regency houses. Yetthree times this year residents and businessmen have marched through the streets of Bristol—first carrying a coffin and then, twice, with a tank—to protest against plans by the mayor,George Ferguson, to roll out stricter parking regulations. Their discontent hints at the powerfulsense of entitlement felt by Britain's car owners. It also highlights the limits of devolvedgovernment.
Bristol is one of the most congested cities in Britain. Traffic during the evening rush hour movesmore slowly than anywhere except Belfast, Edinburgh and London. Fashion and officialprodding have put more bicycles on the roads: bike traffic has grown by 25% since 2003. Butcar use has not dropped. Getting around in the city can be unbearable, concedes Mr Ferguson: “If we're just one great bloody traffic jam we're not going to be an economically thriving city.”
Bristol was the only city to vote for a mayor in a series of plebiscites held in 2012; nine othersrejected them. And Bristolians plumped for a man who promised to do something about traffic.Mr Ferguson's first pledge was “getting Bristol moving”. He has abolished Sunday parkingcharges. But the mayor is also in the process of introducing tighter parking restrictions beyondthe city centre, often in places where parking is currently free, along with 15 resident parkingzones. Locals will pay 48 (81) for the first permit to park near their homes.
Under current plans, businesses will only be allocated a handful of parking permits. Employeeswho do not get them will have to find other ways of getting to work in a city with a less thanwonderful bus network. This irks business owners. “Potentially 45 minutes will be added to along commute,” complains Jonathan Marchant, who works at an accountancy firm in Clifton.Other companies are threatening to move out of the city.
Mr Ferguson has much less sway over public transport than the mayor of London does, whichmakes it harder to lubricate unpopular changes. When Ken Livingstone, the former boss ofLondon, introduced a controversial congestion charge to the city in 2003 he was also able topromise to lay on more buses and pump a successful transport system with cash. All MrFerguson can really do is negotiate with the privatised bus operator to bring down fares andextend routes slightly. For big projects he depends on largesse from Westminster even morethan London mayors do. And cash to spend on big projects is tight these days in any case.
Worse, Mr Ferguson's reach does not extend far. Around two-thirds of metropolitan Bristol isunder his control; the other third is run by another council, South Gloucestershire. This makesco-ordinating transport policy tricky, and increases the likelihood that politicians will squabble.Even if the mayor succeeds, the metropolis might not benefit much. In Clifton, a suspensionbridge links Bristol with North Somerset. “Everybody and his daughter will park there and walkacross,” predicts one resident. Rather than solving a city's traffic problem, Mr Ferguson mightjust end up pushing it elsewhere.